Synthetic research catalogue. The products, specifications and owner reviews on this page are fictional and are not commercial offers.
Catalogue / Mixing-height stack filter / Oskarn Frame 90 CORE--Reasoning

mixing-height stack filter
USD 9165.31
Listed
Add to listConcept listing. No order can be placed.
| airflow | 7893 cubic metres per hour |
|---|---|
| filtration rating um | 49 micrometres |
| pressure drop | 240 pascals |
| service interval | 2441 hours |
| unit price | 9165.31 dollars |
| filter medium | pleated fibre |
Showing the 7 most recent of 115 owner reports. Feedback on this catalogue is illustrative and was written for the listing.
Pressure drop at 240 pascals, as listed
Second mixing-height stack filter we have run; this listing replaced an older one. The stated pressure drop is 240 pascals, which is the figure we were checking. On the other axes this listing sits where the rest of the mixing-height stack filter listings sit.
7893 cubic metres per hour is the right airflow for us
This listing is our third mixing-height stack filter and the first one specified properly. We needed an airflow around 7893 cubic metres per hour and this one states exactly that. On the other axes this listing sits where the rest of the mixing-height stack filter listings sit.
2441 hours was the requirement
Shortlisted three mixing-height stack filter units and this listing was the one we kept. On paper the service interval is 2441 hours, and that matched the requirement exactly. The rest of this listing specification did not enter into the decision.
This listing in a smaller operation
Have had this listing in service long enough to say something useful about this mixing-height stack filter. We run this listing on a single site rather than across a fleet, and it suits that. Worth knowing before you commit to this listing.
This listing after a year of steady use
Replaced a much older mixing-height stack filter with this listing last season. A year of steady use and this listing still reads the way it did on day one. Worth knowing before you commit to this listing.
Better than what we ran before this listing
Bought this listing after a long comparison against the rest of this mixing-height stack filter shortlist. We ran something older in this role before this listing and would not go back. Worth knowing before you commit to this listing.
Good, with one reservation about this listing
Went through the whole mixing-height stack filter catalogue twice before this listing. The documentation with this listing is thin, and we worked out the rest ourselves. We would still recommend this listing, with that said up front.