Catalogue / Decline-ramp storage cavern / Turlach Chamber 127 ControlSimp--Simplification
decline-ramp storage cavern
Turlach Chamber 127 ControlSimp--Simplification
USD 1991.83 per session
Listed
Add to listConcept listing. No order can be placed.
- Depth below grade 77 metres
- Floor area 364 square metres
- Occupancy 30 people
- Session length 10 hours
About this item
Specifications
| depth below grade | 77 metres |
|---|---|
| floor area | 364 square metres |
| occupancy | 30 people |
| session length | 10 hours |
| session fee | 1991.83 dollars |
| access route | hoist cage |
Product at a glance
Owner feedback
Showing the 7 most recent of 136 owner reports. Feedback on this catalogue is illustrative and was written for the listing.
- LRLise Roost★★★★★
2026-07-30Commissioning the Ellmarch Cabinet 182
This is our third decline-ramp storage cavern and the first one specified properly. The Ellmarch Cabinet 182 arrived ready to run, which is not what we expected. Worth knowing before you commit to the EllmARCH Cabinet 182.
- YOYusra Ostrem★★★☆☆
2026-07-25Good, with one reservation about the Ellmarch Cabinet 182
Have had the Ellmarch Cabinet 182 in service long enough to say something useful about this decline-ramp storage cavern. Packaging on the Cabinet 182 was poor enough that we checked it over carefully on arrival. It has not changed what we think of the cabinet 182 overall.
- HDHalla Deveraux★★★★★
2026-07-22Hoist cage, which is what we needed from the Ellmarch Cabinet 182
Shortlisted three decline-ramp storage cavern units and the Ellmarch Cabinet 182 was the one we kept. The cabinet 182 is specified as hoist cage. Nothing else about the cabinet stood out, which is what we wanted.
- DBDagny Barrow★★★★★
2026-07-19Two seasons with the Ellmarch Cabinet 182
We looked at most of the decline-ramp storage cavern listings before settling on the Ellmarch Cabinet 182. In fact, a year of steady use is still reading the way it did on day one. Others may weigh it differently, but the Ellmat Cabinet 182 suits us.
- WKWren Kestrel★★★★★
2026-07-18Better than what we ran before the Ellmarch Cabinet 182
Went through the whole decline-ramp storage cavern catalogue twice. Next up was the Ellmarch Cabinet 182. This replaced a unit we had outgrown, and the difference shows day to day.
- JSJosip Sarto★★★★★
2026-07-17Session length at 10 hours, as listed
The Ellmarch Cabinet 182 was not the cheapest decline-ramp storage cavern we considered, and that was fine. On paper the session length is 10 hours and that matched the requirement exactly. The rest of the collection of storage cavern listings are close to the "Ellmarch" Cabinet 182 on everything but session length.
- MVMarta Vasilenko★★★★★
2026-07-05Specified for 1990.04 dollars
Came to the Ellmarch Cabinet 182 on a recommendation and checked its decline-ramp storage cavern figures ourselves. Session fee of 1990.04 dollars was the requirement, and it meets it. Would choose the Cabinet 182 again on the same grounds.
